What are the consequences of letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3?

Letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3 is a significant story choice that has far-reaching consequences for the game's narrative, particularly in the late stages of the campaign. Orpheus is a central figure in the Githyanki lore, and his fate is tied to the broader conflict involving the Mind Flayers, the Githyanki, and the player's journey to rid themselves of the Illithid tadpole. HereÔÇÖs a detailed breakdown of what happens if you allow the Githyanki to kill Orpheus, along with the mechanics, strategies, and considerations involved in making this choice.

First, to understand the consequences of letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus, you need to know who Orpheus is and why he matters. Orpheus is the son of Gith, the legendary leader who freed the Githyanki from Mind Flayer enslavement. He is imprisoned by Vlaakith, the current Githyanki queen, who sees him as a threat to her rule. Orpheus possesses a unique power that can suppress the Illithid tadpoles, making him a key figure in the player's quest to avoid becoming a Mind Flayer. If you allow the Githyanki to kill Orpheus, you are essentially siding with Vlaakith and her forces, which has major implications for the story.

To reach the point where you can make this choice, you must progress through the main story until you reach the Astral Plane. This is where you encounter the Githyanki and learn more about Orpheus. The decision to let the Githyanki kill Orpheus typically arises during a confrontation with Vlaakith or her forces. If you choose to side with Vlaakith, she will order her soldiers to execute Orpheus, and you must stand by and allow it to happen. This choice is irreversible and will lock you into a specific story path.

One of the immediate consequences of letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus is that you lose access to his unique powers. OrpheusÔÇÖs abilities are crucial for resisting the Illithid transformation, and without him, your options for dealing with the tadpole become more limited. This can make the final stages of the game more challenging, as you will have fewer tools to combat the Mind Flayers and their influence. Additionally, killing Orpheus alienates LaeÔÇÖzel, the Githyanki companion in your party. LaeÔÇÖzel is deeply loyal to her people and sees Orpheus as a savior. If you allow his death, she will likely turn against you, either leaving the party or becoming hostile.

From a narrative perspective, letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus aligns you with Vlaakith and her vision for the Githyanki. This can lead to a darker ending where Vlaakith consolidates her power and continues her tyrannical rule. It also means that the Githyanki remain under her control, with no hope of reform or liberation. This choice reflects a willingness to prioritize your own survival over the greater good, as you are essentially sacrificing Orpheus to maintain your alliance with Vlaakith.

In terms of gameplay mechanics, this choice affects your interactions with the Githyanki for the rest of the game. If you side with Vlaakith, you will gain her favor, which can provide certain benefits, such as access to powerful Githyanki allies or resources. However, these benefits come at a cost, as you will lose the opportunity to explore alternative paths that could lead to a more hopeful outcome for the Githyanki and the world at large.

When making this choice, itÔÇÖs important to consider your party composition and your relationship with LaeÔÇÖzel. If LaeÔÇÖzel is a key member of your team, her potential departure or hostility could significantly impact your combat effectiveness. You may need to adjust your strategy and build to compensate for her absence. Additionally, if you are playing a character who values morality and the greater good, allowing Orpheus to die may conflict with your role-playing goals.

A common mistake players make is underestimating the long-term consequences of this choice. While siding with Vlaakith may seem advantageous in the short term, it can lead to a less satisfying ending and limit your options in the final act of the game. ItÔÇÖs also important to note that this choice is not easily reversible, so you should be certain of your decision before proceeding.

In terms of advanced techniques, you can optimize your gameplay by preparing for the loss of OrpheusÔÇÖs powers. This might involve investing in abilities or items that provide resistance to Mind Flayer influence, such as the Protection from Evil and Good spell or the Ring of Mind Shielding. You can also focus on building a party that is less reliant on LaeÔÇÖzel, ensuring that her potential departure does not leave you at a disadvantage.

From a D&D rules perspective, the choice to let the Githyanki kill Orpheus reflects the alignment system. Siding with Vlaakith and allowing Orpheus to die is a Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil decision, as it prioritizes order and self-interest over freedom and justice. This choice can influence your characterÔÇÖs alignment and how other characters perceive you throughout the game.

In conclusion, letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus is a major story decision with significant consequences for the narrative, your party, and the world of BaldurÔÇÖs Gate 3. It aligns you with Vlaakith and her vision for the Githyanki, but at the cost of losing OrpheusÔÇÖs powers and potentially alienating LaeÔÇÖzel. This choice requires careful consideration of your characterÔÇÖs goals, your party composition, and the long-term impact on the story. By understanding the mechanics and implications of this decision, you can make an informed choice that aligns with your playstyle and role-playing preferences.