What are the consequences of letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3?

Letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3 is a significant story choice that has far-reaching consequences for the game's narrative, particularly in the late stages of the campaign. Orpheus is a central figure in the Githyanki lore, and his fate is tied to the broader conflict involving the Mind Flayers, the Githyanki, and the player's journey to rid themselves of the Illithid tadpole. To understand the consequences of this choice, itÔÇÖs important to first grasp the context of Orpheus's role in the story and the mechanics involved in making this decision.

Orpheus is the son of Gith, the legendary leader who freed the Githyanki from the Mind Flayers' enslavement. He is imprisoned by Vlaakith, the current Githyanki queen, who sees him as a threat to her rule. Throughout the game, the player learns that Orpheus possesses the power to resist the Mind Flayers' influence, making him a key figure in the fight against the Illithid threat. However, the Githyanki, under Vlaakith's command, are determined to kill Orpheus to maintain their queen's dominance.

To let the Githyanki kill Orpheus, the player must align themselves with Vlaakith and her forces. This typically occurs during the late-game questline involving the Astral Prism, where the player is faced with a critical decision: side with the Emperor (the Mind Flayer ally who has been guiding the player) or free Orpheus. If the player chooses to side with the Emperor, they will ultimately allow the Githyanki to kill Orpheus, as the Emperor views Orpheus as a threat to his own survival and the player's mission.

The mechanics of this choice involve dialogue options and narrative decisions. When the player reaches the Astral Prism, they will have the opportunity to communicate with the Emperor and Orpheus. The Emperor will urge the player to trust him and reject Orpheus, while Orpheus will plead for his freedom. If the player decides to side with the Emperor, they will effectively allow the Githyanki to kill Orpheus, as the Emperor will use his influence to prevent Orpheus from being freed.

The consequences of this choice are profound. By letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus, the player aligns themselves with Vlaakith and the Githyanki empire, which can lead to a more authoritarian and militaristic ending. This decision also impacts the player's relationship with Lae'zel, the Githyanki companion. If Lae'zel is in the party, she will likely be deeply conflicted or even hostile toward the player, as she is a devout follower of Vlaakith but also values the freedom and legacy of her people. Depending on the player's choices, Lae'zel may leave the party or turn against the player entirely.

Additionally, killing Orpheus removes a potential ally in the final battle against the Mind Flayers. Orpheus's powers could have been used to resist the Illithid threat, and without him, the player may face a more challenging endgame. The Emperor, while powerful, is not as reliable as Orpheus, and his motivations are often self-serving. This can lead to a less satisfying resolution to the story, as the player may feel they have betrayed their own principles or the trust of their companions.

One important tip to consider is the impact of this choice on the player's overall narrative experience. Baldur's Gate 3 is a game that rewards moral complexity and role-playing, and letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus is a choice that aligns with a more pragmatic or self-interested playstyle. Players who prioritize survival and power over idealism may find this choice appealing, but it comes at the cost of alienating certain companions and potentially missing out on a more heroic ending.

A common mistake to avoid is making this decision without fully understanding the implications. The game does not always spell out the long-term consequences of your choices, so it's important to pay attention to the dialogue and lore surrounding Orpheus and the Githyanki. Rushing through the decision without considering the impact on your companions or the story can lead to unintended outcomes.

Advanced techniques for optimizing this choice involve carefully managing your relationships with key characters, particularly Lae'zel and the Emperor. Building a strong rapport with Lae'zel can mitigate some of the negative consequences of killing Orpheus, as she may be more willing to forgive the player if they have a high approval rating. Similarly, maintaining a good relationship with the Emperor can make it easier to justify siding with him, as he will be more persuasive and trustworthy.

In terms of D&D rules and mechanics, this choice reflects the alignment system and the concept of moral dilemmas. Letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus is a Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil decision, as it prioritizes order and self-preservation over freedom and justice. Players who role-play as characters with these alignments may find this choice more in line with their character's motivations.

Specific examples of this choice in action include the final confrontation in the Astral Prism, where the player must decide whether to free Orpheus or side with the Emperor. If the player chooses the latter, they will witness the Githyanki killing Orpheus, and the Emperor will take control of the situation. This leads to a different set of endgame scenarios, where the player must rely on the Emperor's guidance and face the consequences of their decision.

In conclusion, letting the Githyanki kill Orpheus is a significant and morally complex choice in Baldur's Gate 3. It has major implications for the story, the player's relationships with their companions, and the overall outcome of the game. Players should carefully consider the consequences of this decision and weigh the benefits of aligning with Vlaakith and the Emperor against the potential loss of allies and a more heroic resolution to the story.