What happens if I let the Emperor kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3?

In Baldur's Gate 3, the decision to let the Emperor kill Orpheus is a pivotal moment in the game's story, with significant consequences for the narrative and the fate of key characters. This choice occurs during the late stages of the game, specifically in Act 3, when the player is faced with the dilemma of whether to side with the Emperor, a mind flayer who has been guiding the party, or to free Orpheus, a Githyanki prince who has the potential to unite his people against the mind flayer threat. Letting the Emperor kill Orpheus is one of the possible outcomes, and it has far-reaching implications for the story and the player's relationships with companions, particularly Lae'zel, who is deeply connected to Orpheus and the Githyanki cause.

To achieve this outcome, the player must first progress through the main story until they reach the point where the Emperor reveals his true intentions and the nature of his relationship with Orpheus. This occurs after the party has gathered the necessary artifacts and information to confront the Absolute, the game's primary antagonist. The Emperor will present the player with a choice: either allow him to consume Orpheus's power to strengthen their position against the Absolute, or free Orpheus and risk losing the Emperor's support. Choosing to let the Emperor kill Orpheus requires the player to side with the Emperor and trust his judgment, despite the moral and ethical implications of this decision.

The mechanics involved in this choice are primarily narrative-driven, with the player's dialogue options determining the outcome. When the Emperor presents the choice, the player must select dialogue options that indicate their willingness to let him kill Orpheus. This will trigger a cutscene in which the Emperor consumes Orpheus's essence, gaining the power needed to confront the Absolute. The player must then continue to support the Emperor's plans, which may involve making further difficult choices, such as sacrificing allies or embracing the mind flayer transformation.

One important tip to consider is the impact this decision will have on Lae'zel, who is a key companion and a devout follower of the Githyanki cause. If the player chooses to let the Emperor kill Orpheus, Lae'zel will be deeply conflicted and may even leave the party, depending on the player's previous interactions with her. To mitigate this, the player should ensure they have built a strong relationship with Lae'zel throughout the game, as this may influence her reaction and potentially allow her to remain loyal despite the loss of Orpheus. Additionally, the player should be prepared for the consequences of siding with the Emperor, as this may alienate other companions who are wary of mind flayers and their manipulative nature.

A common mistake to avoid is making this decision without fully understanding the implications for the story and the party dynamics. The choice to let the Emperor kill Orpheus is irreversible and will significantly alter the game's ending, so the player should carefully consider their options and the potential outcomes before committing to this path. It is also important to note that this decision may lock the player out of certain quests and storylines, particularly those related to the Githyanki and their struggle for freedom.

Advanced techniques for optimizing this choice involve leveraging the player's knowledge of the game's mechanics and story to maximize the benefits of siding with the Emperor. For example, the player can use their understanding of the mind flayer transformation to their advantage, embracing the powers granted by the Emperor to gain an edge in combat and overcome the challenges posed by the Absolute. Additionally, the player can use their influence over their companions to ensure their loyalty, even in the face of difficult choices, by consistently making decisions that align with their values and goals.

In terms of related D&D rules and mechanics, the choice to let the Emperor kill Orpheus reflects the game's adherence to the moral complexity and ethical dilemmas that are central to the Dungeons & Dragons experience. The decision to side with a mind flayer, a traditionally evil and manipulative creature, challenges the player to consider the greater good and the sacrifices necessary to achieve it. This choice also highlights the importance of alignment and character motivation, as the player's decision will be influenced by their character's beliefs and the relationships they have built with their companions.

Specific examples and scenarios that illustrate the consequences of this choice include the potential for Lae'zel to leave the party, the loss of opportunities to ally with the Githyanki, and the impact on the game's ending. For instance, if the player chooses to let the Emperor kill Orpheus, they may find themselves isolated from the Githyanki and their allies, making it more difficult to achieve certain objectives. Conversely, the player may gain powerful abilities and insights from the Emperor, allowing them to overcome challenges that would otherwise be insurmountable.

In conclusion, the decision to let the Emperor kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3 is a complex and morally challenging choice that has significant consequences for the story and the player's relationships with their companions. By carefully considering the implications of this decision and leveraging their knowledge of the game's mechanics and story, the player can navigate this difficult choice and shape the outcome of their journey in the world of Baldur's Gate.