What happens if I let the Emperor kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3?

In Baldur's Gate 3, the decision to let the Emperor kill Orpheus is a pivotal moment in the game's story, with significant consequences for the narrative and the fate of key characters. This choice occurs during the late stages of the game, specifically in Act 3, when the player is faced with the dilemma of whether to side with the Emperor, a mind flayer who has been guiding the party, or to free Orpheus, a githyanki prince who has the potential to unite his people against the mind flayer threat. Letting the Emperor kill Orpheus is one of the possible outcomes, and it has far-reaching implications for the story and the player's relationships with their companions.

To reach this point in the game, the player must first progress through the main questline, which involves uncovering the truth about the mind flayer tadpoles implanted in the party members and the larger threat posed by the Absolute. The Emperor is revealed to be a key figure in this plot, and the player must navigate a complex web of alliances and betrayals. As the story progresses, the player will eventually encounter Orpheus, who is being held captive by the Emperor. The player is then faced with a critical choice: to free Orpheus and potentially gain his aid, or to allow the Emperor to kill him and continue to rely on the Emperor's guidance.

The mechanics of this choice are relatively straightforward, but the consequences are profound. When the player reaches the point in the story where they must decide Orpheus's fate, they will be presented with a dialogue option that allows them to either free Orpheus or let the Emperor kill him. If the player chooses to let the Emperor kill Orpheus, the Emperor will absorb Orpheus's power, which strengthens his own abilities and allows him to continue guiding the party. However, this decision also means that the githyanki will remain divided, as Orpheus was their best hope for uniting against the mind flayers. Additionally, this choice may strain the player's relationship with Lae'zel, a githyanki companion who is deeply invested in freeing Orpheus and restoring her people's honor.

One important tip to consider when making this decision is to think carefully about the long-term consequences. While letting the Emperor kill Orpheus may seem like the easier choice in the short term, it can have significant repercussions for the game's ending and the fate of the githyanki. Players who are invested in Lae'zel's personal storyline may want to consider the impact this decision will have on her, as it could lead to her leaving the party or becoming hostile. On the other hand, players who prioritize the Emperor's guidance and are willing to sacrifice Orpheus for the greater good may find this choice to be the most pragmatic option.

A common mistake to avoid is making this decision without fully understanding the implications. The game does not always make it clear how each choice will affect the story, so it is important to pay close attention to the dialogue and the motivations of the characters involved. Additionally, players should be aware that this choice is irreversible, so it is crucial to weigh the pros and cons before committing to a decision.

Advanced techniques for optimizing this choice involve considering the player's overall strategy and the composition of their party. For example, if the player has built a strong relationship with Lae'zel and wants to maintain her loyalty, they may want to prioritize freeing Orpheus. Conversely, if the player has been relying heavily on the Emperor's guidance and believes that his continued support is essential for defeating the Absolute, they may choose to let him kill Orpheus. It is also worth considering the potential impact on other companions, as some may have strong opinions about the Emperor and the githyanki.

From a D&D rules perspective, this choice reflects the game's emphasis on moral ambiguity and the consequences of player decisions. The Emperor and Orpheus represent two very different paths, each with its own set of risks and rewards. The Emperor is a mind flayer, a creature typically associated with evil in D&D lore, but he has been helping the party and may genuinely believe that his actions are for the greater good. Orpheus, on the other hand, is a githyanki prince with the potential to unite his people, but freeing him could also lead to unforeseen consequences. This choice is a classic example of the kind of moral dilemmas that are central to the D&D experience, where there is no clear right or wrong answer, and the player must weigh the potential outcomes carefully.

In conclusion, letting the Emperor kill Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3 is a significant decision that can have a major impact on the game's story and the player's relationships with their companions. To make this choice, the player must progress through the main questline and reach the point where they must decide Orpheus's fate. The decision to let the Emperor kill Orpheus strengthens the Emperor's abilities but may strain the player's relationship with Lae'zel and leave the githyanki divided. Players should carefully consider the long-term consequences of this choice, avoid making hasty decisions, and think about how it aligns with their overall strategy and party composition. This choice is a prime example of the moral complexity and narrative depth that Baldur's Gate 3 offers, making it a memorable and impactful moment in the game.