What happens if I let the Emperor consume Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3?

In Baldur's Gate 3, the decision to let the Emperor consume Orpheus is a pivotal moment in the game's story, with significant consequences for the narrative and the characters involved. This choice occurs during the late stages of the game, specifically in Act 3, when the player is faced with the dilemma of how to deal with the Mind Flayer threat and the fate of Orpheus, a powerful Githyanki prince who is being held captive by the Emperor. The Emperor, a Mind Flayer who has been guiding the player throughout the game, offers to consume Orpheus to gain his powers, which he claims are necessary to defeat the Absolute. This decision is not to be taken lightly, as it has far-reaching implications for the story, the companions, and the world of Baldur's Gate.

To reach this point in the game, the player must progress through the main questline, which involves uncovering the truth about the Mind Flayer tadpoles, the Absolute, and the role of the Githyanki in the larger conflict. The player will encounter the Emperor in the Astral Plane, where he reveals his true nature as a Mind Flayer and his connection to Orpheus. The Emperor explains that Orpheus possesses a unique power that can resist the influence of the Absolute, but that this power can only be harnessed if Orpheus is consumed. The player is then given the choice to either allow the Emperor to consume Orpheus or to find another way to deal with the threat.

If the player chooses to let the Emperor consume Orpheus, the following steps will occur. First, the Emperor will proceed to consume Orpheus, absorbing his powers and becoming even more powerful. This action will have immediate consequences, as the Githyanki, who revere Orpheus as a hero and a savior, will view this as a betrayal. The player's relationship with Lae'zel, a Githyanki companion, will be severely strained, and she may even leave the party if she feels that the player has betrayed her people. Additionally, the player will have to deal with the moral implications of allowing a Mind Flayer to consume a sentient being, which may affect the player's standing with other companions and factions.

One important tip to consider is that this decision should be made with a clear understanding of the consequences. The player should weigh the potential benefits of allowing the Emperor to gain Orpheus's powers against the moral and ethical implications of the act. It is also important to consider the impact on the player's relationships with companions, particularly Lae'zel, who has a personal stake in the fate of Orpheus. If the player is role-playing a character who values loyalty and honor, allowing the Emperor to consume Orpheus may not align with their character's values.

A common mistake to avoid is making this decision without fully understanding the context and the stakes involved. The player should take the time to explore all available dialogue options and gather as much information as possible before making a choice. This includes speaking with companions, particularly Lae'zel, to understand their perspectives and how they might react to the decision. Additionally, the player should consider the long-term consequences of their choice, as it will affect the ending of the game and the fate of the world.

Advanced techniques or optimizations for this decision involve considering the player's overall strategy and goals. If the player is aiming for a specific ending or outcome, they should plan their choices accordingly. For example, if the player wants to maintain a positive relationship with Lae'zel and the Githyanki, they may choose to find another way to deal with the threat of the Absolute, such as by freeing Orpheus and using his powers directly. On the other hand, if the player is more concerned with defeating the Absolute at any cost, they may decide that allowing the Emperor to consume Orpheus is the most effective solution.

In terms of related D&D rules and mechanics, the decision to allow the Emperor to consume Orpheus can be seen as a reflection of the alignment system in Dungeons & Dragons. A character who chooses to allow the Emperor to consume Orpheus may be acting in a way that aligns with a more utilitarian or pragmatic approach, prioritizing the greater good over individual morality. Conversely, a character who refuses to allow the Emperor to consume Orpheus may be acting in accordance with a more principled or ethical alignment, valuing the sanctity of life and the rights of individuals.

Specific examples and scenarios that illustrate the consequences of this decision include the potential for conflict with the Githyanki, who may become hostile towards the player if they perceive the consumption of Orpheus as a betrayal. This could lead to combat encounters with Githyanki forces, as well as the loss of Lae'zel as a companion. Additionally, the player may face moral dilemmas in their interactions with other characters, who may question the player's decision and its implications for the world.

In conclusion, the decision to let the Emperor consume Orpheus in Baldur's Gate 3 is a complex and morally charged choice that has significant consequences for the story, the companions, and the world. The player should carefully consider the implications of this decision, taking into account the potential benefits and drawbacks, as well as the impact on their relationships with companions and factions. By understanding the context and the stakes involved, the player can make an informed decision that aligns with their character's values and goals.